Talk:Dayton, Ohio/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 15:19, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 15:19, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Overall summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

This is a comprehensive article, generally well-referenced and well-illustrated. You have a few (about 8) broken web links (see []) and in places your citations are somewhat absent, so it would not make WP:FAC without improvements. But this is WP:GAN, so I'm awarding GA-status. I enjoyed reading this article and learnt a few things: I knew about Wright-Patterson AFB, but I did not know until know that the "Wright" was Wright the pioneer of flight. Congratulations on producing a Good Article. Pyrotec (talk) 17:05, 24 April 2010 (UTC)