Talk:Dead-blow hammer

Untitled
I believe that the promulgation of knowledge about tools, hand tools in particular, is crucial to helping us learn more about what it means to be human. With tools we share a most intimate relationship, one that needs to be understood and explored. This rationale urged me to post an entry for the "dead blow hammer." Just as tools improve our own work, I hope others will improve this entry.

Also, I plan to upload my own photo of a dead blow hammer ASAP, so don't worry about the absence of an image.

Physics expertise needed
The article lacks a physical explanation of how a dead blow hammer transfers more of its kinetic energy than a hammer that rebounds from the struck surface. The effect of the lead shot or sand filling (vs. a liquid vs. a solid filling) causes the different behavior of the hammer upon impact. Please give an intuitive explanation as well as an analytical mathematical explanation. Reify-tech (talk) 22:20, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Requested move 21 October 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 07:09, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Dead blow hammer → Dead-blow hammer – The new article title would use proper punctuation for a compound adjective. 31.223.130.252 (talk) 05:17, 21 October 2022 (UTC)' The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support per WP:HYPHEN. Rreagan007 (talk) 07:43, 21 October 2022 (UTC)