Talk:Dead Putting Society/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  The Flash  {talk} 18:50, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Hey. I saw this at GAN and thought I'd review it (as part of my little mission to clear some of the backlog) See Talk:I Married Marge/GA1 for how I perform GARs. Let's get started!  The Flash  {talk} 18:50, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Lead

 * "[...]makes a bet with Ned that the father of boy[...]" -> "the father of the boy"
 * ✅  The left orium  19:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Plot

 * "Beautiful" sounds a bit un-POV. Can you find a neutral synonym?
 * ✅ Removed the word since it didn't seem necessary.  The left orium  19:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Please mention that they enter the tournament.
 * ✅  The left orium  19:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Production

 * "[...]based much of golf-related scenes in the script" -> "of the golf-related scenes"
 * ✅  The left orium  19:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Wikilink to straight man (double act)
 * ✅  The left orium  19:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Reception

 * Could you make ratings its own paragraph? I know it's rather short, but it looks like it could easily work on its own.
 * ✅  The left orium  19:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Images

 * What do you think about something like this to illustrate the mechanics of a golf swing the episode talks about? Understood if you don't agree with a FU image being used on the article, though.
 * That image doesn't really show the actual swing (a video would be required), so I'd prefer not to use it.  The left orium  19:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The sole image looks fine.


 * Wow, thank you for reviewing the article so quickly. I really appreciate it. :) By the way, I think the plot section needs to be shortened a bit so please hold the review until I'm done with that.  The left orium  19:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I've trimmed to the plot section now.  The left orium  19:28, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem. And thank you for shortening the plot.

Final say

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Great job. I've gone ahead and passed the article. Cheers,  The Flash  {talk} 01:07, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Great job. I've gone ahead and passed the article. Cheers,  The Flash  {talk} 01:07, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Great job. I've gone ahead and passed the article. Cheers,  The Flash  {talk} 01:07, 11 January 2010 (UTC)