Talk:Deafness in Thailand

About the missing Lead section
This article is part of a WikiEdu project that is currently in progress. The Lead section will be added within a few weeks. Matthall.research (talk) 21:15, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Language Emergence section
No significant improvement since initial submission: score remains 2.5/3 Matthall.research (talk) 23:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Significant Organizations section
Nice improvement here, although it's still not clear which of these are Deaf-led. Score: 2.75/3 Matthall.research (talk) 23:53, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Human/Civil Rights section
No meaningful improvement: score remains 2/3. Matthall.research (talk) 23:57, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Primary & Secondary Education
Generally good content, but the final paragraph still lacks citations, which prevents me from giving this a higher score than 2/3. Matthall.research (talk) 00:01, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Employment
This section is great! Clearly organized, well-cited, providing both big-picture context and relevant details. Excellent work! Score: 3/3 Matthall.research (talk) 00:04, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Healthcare
The content you present here focuses on hearing technologies, as if you view deafness as the primary threat to DHH people's health. That's quite disconcerting to see at this point in the course! The goal of this section is to report on how DHH people manage to keep their whole selves (mind and body) healthy: how do they develop health literacy, communicate with healthcare providers, access information from public health authorities, etc. I'm afraid I can't give this anything higher than a 1/3. Matthall.research (talk) 00:08, 30 November 2022 (UTC)