Talk:Dealbreakers Talk Show No. 0001/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Beloved  Freak  20:38, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * No major problems, gave it a copyedit.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * No problems, all seem reliable. About.com ref is an interview.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Covers all major points, can't see any obvious critical analysis etc. missed.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * No problems
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * no problems
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Appropriate use and licenses.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Good job.

Ok, I've done a bit of a copyedit, as usual, check that it's all acceptable! Now, I've also cut some detail out of the production section which I don't feel is necessary here (recapping of previous episodes). It's not a dealbreaker (excuse the pun!), so if you're attached to those bits, feel free to re-add them. I didn't think they were really necessary to understanding this episode. Also, some of the bits about the plot for this episode, don't need to be repeated in production, as I think we can assume the reader has read that bit first. Anyway, as I say, it's just my personal opinion, not GA requirements, so feel free to change it back!

One thing I've wondered about before, but forgot until now, is you use of "fictional" when talking about TGS. I'm not sure it's necessary, because the whole thing is fictional, but within the universe of 30 Rock, TGS is a real show, right? Does that make sense? Anyway, I'll leave that up to you to change if you agree. I'm happy to list this as a good article, so well done!-- Beloved Freak  21:07, 25 July 2010 (UTC)