Talk:Death and state funeral of Ronald Reagan/GA1

GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:Death and state funeral of Ronald Reagan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hello, I will be reviewing this article for GA grading. Thanks!--Finalnight (talk) 01:46, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

--Finalnight (talk) 03:47, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:


 * Hi, thanks for the review. So it seems that you feel that the article does not fully comply with NPOV standards. Let me give the article a thorough look over and copyedit, hopefully rewording and restructuring problematic areas. Then let's see where we stand after that. Fair enough? Thanks again, Happyme22 (talk) 06:04, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Sounds good to me!--Finalnight (talk) 07:22, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Great! Okay, I've run through it, keeping in ming your suggestions above. Does it look better? And if not, could you provide specific areas that you feel need improvement to get the article to GA? Of course the media comments section could use expansion to include quotes from the general public, but I don't feel that it is holding the article back from becoming GA. I think one of the biggest problems is that pretty much all of the media coverage was deferential to Reagan because he had just died, focusing on the positive aspects of his life and of the funeral itself. I will make some more attempts, though. Happyme22 (talk) 17:49, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Well I've now added some additional critical comments from the public and retitled the last section to reflect such. Happyme22 (talk) 17:59, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I did some cleanup on top of your changes and it looks ready to go now.--Finalnight (talk) 21:34, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Wonderful! Thanks for all your suggestions and help! Happyme22 (talk) 21:55, 1 July 2008 (UTC)