Talk:Death and state funeral of Ruth Bader Ginsburg/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Maile66 (talk · contribs) 18:11, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * Jasmine Clemons of Planned Parenthood said "I made the best decision for my life, my future and my body ... " but doesn't say what her decision was. If it was an abortion, it's unclear here.
 * Done. --- C &amp; C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 20:24, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The sentence that begins, "On September 20, former U.S. President Bill Clinton, who nominated Ginsburg" is an incredibly long run-on sentence that takes up half the paragraph. Perhaps make it two sentences?
 * Done. --- C &amp; C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 20:24, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * As far as I can tell, this article is based on news accounts, not OR
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * Earwig's tool flags a lot, but it all seems to be quotations and common phrases and proper nouns that cannot be avoided.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * Per Photographs of identifiable people and Copyright rules by territory/United States the images provided are permitted, and documented where uploaded on Commons
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Congratulations. I noticed the nomination by accident today. And today, of all days, it seems appropriate to honor her memory with this review. — Maile  (talk) 20:36, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Maile! And thanks, Coffeeandcrumbs, for nominating the article and for taking care of the issues that needed to be addressed so quickly! Nsk92 (talk) 20:53, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * It's impressive to see this at GA status already. Congrats to all involved! &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 23:26, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Per Photographs of identifiable people and Copyright rules by territory/United States the images provided are permitted, and documented where uploaded on Commons
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Congratulations. I noticed the nomination by accident today. And today, of all days, it seems appropriate to honor her memory with this review. — Maile  (talk) 20:36, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Maile! And thanks, Coffeeandcrumbs, for nominating the article and for taking care of the issues that needed to be addressed so quickly! Nsk92 (talk) 20:53, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * It's impressive to see this at GA status already. Congrats to all involved! &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 23:26, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * It's impressive to see this at GA status already. Congrats to all involved! &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 23:26, 3 November 2020 (UTC)