Talk:Death of Anthony Baez

Comments
Francis X Livoti has served his time for the state's charge of "violating" Anthony Baez's civil rights.

He has the right to tell his point of view and not have his life story redirected to Anthony Baez's page.

His redirect to Anthony Baez's page has been protected and does not cite any references or sources.

NOT REALLY A Whitegirl01 00:29, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Livoti does not meet notability requirements outside of the Baez incident. WP:NOTSOAPBOX. -Etoile ✩ (talk) 14:16, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Not an impartial description of the events
This article concerning Anthony Baez's murder by the NYPD misleads the reader into believing the innocence of the NYPD's institutional conspiracy and conver-up of its members - members that have been prosecuted over and over again through the decades for abuse of power and performing oppression. The presiding judge overlooking the case himself pronounced what everyone with even one good eye could see: perjury and nepotist scandal from some of the highest rankings in the police and judicial department.

Whoever wrote this article trying to legitimize the force with which killed Baez clearly has an interest in historical revisionism. Those of us who need only look out our windows to see clear abuses of power by the so-called authorities can see this act of retroactive exoneration of Livoti as a means to re-write the truth into historical fiction.

This doesn't seem to be an impartial description of the events. There are many missing citations.

Alyoness (talk) 9:38 am, 1 June 2008, Sunday (2 years, 10 months, 7 days ago) (UTC−4)aLyoness

This is suspiciously like an attempted exoneration of Livoti; we have recently learned that the NYPD is likely to have had members rewriting and "whitewashing" Wikipedia pages that pertain to their actions. I would love to have the history on this entry looked at and a more reasonable version, one that fits with the accepted facts of the case, put in place. Actio (talk) 05:16, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

412 police officers?
"it took four hundred and twelve police officers to handcuff him" -- I find it hard to believe that it took 412 police officers to handcuff one man. How would this even work from a purely logistical and physics perspective? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.190.232.92 (talk) 05:18, 21 January 2011 (UTC)