Talk:Deathlord

Fair use rationale for Image:Dlcover.jpg
Image:Dlcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Richard Garriott question
"Richard Garriott of Origin Systems believed that Deathlord unduly resembled Origin's Ultima games. He ended Origin's affiliation with EA after the company published it, and later Ultima games included a pirate character named Pirt Snikwah.[3]"

What affiliation did they have with EA to begin with? He later sold his company to them years later.  D r e a m Focus  13:10, 5 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Origin, like many other software developers, used larger companies like EA to distribute its software to retailers. Origin ended that relationship because of Deathlord (as the cite explains), so Garriott selling the company to EA was a surprise. Ylee (talk) 14:50, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Specifically, Origin was one of the first participants in EA's affiliated label program in which EA handled distribution as well as providing some publishing and marketing support to smaller developers. This allowed smaller companies to self-publish while bolstering EA's distribution clout, important for a company that had chosen to bypass traditional distributors entirely.  After this incident, Origin became an affiliated label of Broederbund instead. Indrian (talk) 15:12, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
 * That information should be in the Origin article.  D r e a m Focus  15:26, 5 July 2014 (UTC)