Talk:Debian Conference

Untitled
Should this page be renamed to 'Debconf (Conference)' and the Debconf (Software Package) information be removed entirely? Although debconf is a very important software package to Debian, I don't think it needs to be described in Wikipedia.

(Regular Wikipedians: if you agree, please go ahead - I don't know how to implement this myself.)

-- Avbidder 20050425


 * That's self-contradicting - if debconf(8) is a very important part of Debian, why would we avoid describing it in Wikipedia? What makes the conference more encyclopedic than a piece of software? --Joy &#91;shallot&#93;   18:27, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

debconf(8) is imho more or less 'a random piece of the Debian packaging infrastructure' - an important one, but not really important outside its narrow context - it's only important to people developing Debian packages. I bet most people who use Debian don't even know that it's there. I might describe it when I write an article about Debian's software packaging approach.

The Debconf(erence) is more free-standing - people might stumble about it without even knowing what Debian is, perhaps because they see announcements etc. at the location or whatever.

-- Avbidder 20050425

Just a quick Thank You to EdColins for your latest edit - I'm now quite happy with how this is solved.

-- Avbidder 20050520

tagging withthe 'primary sources' tag
I've been asked to explain why I tagged the article with the 'primary sources' tag, so here goes. Currently all the sources / links are to material generated by DebConf (various organising teams, attendees, etc), while these are great for providing content and information they fail the independence test in WP:GNG. Possible sources that are likely to meet the independence test include: (a) articles written by professional journalists and published in print newspapers / magazines / etc and not based on a press release (b) references to groups outside debian trying to set up events using DebConf as a model (c) academic papers by non-Debian people talking about DebConf. The key is that someone independent needs to be involved in writing the content. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:36, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Debian Conference. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080107193830/http://miniconf5.debconf.org/ to http://miniconf5.debconf.org/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071122024159/http://miniconf6.debconf.org/ to http://miniconf6.debconf.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:15, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Debian Conference. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100611234344/http://www.minidebconf.de/2010/berlin/ to http://www.minidebconf.de/2010/berlin/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150205085447/http://www.debutsav.in/ to http://www.debutsav.in/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:46, 14 December 2017 (UTC)