Talk:Debnath

Caste
Nath or Debnath peoples always was brahmins. In gopal bhatt's "Ballal charit" book auther clearly said that the nath's are the higher brahmin cast.
 * Nope; this is not an acceptable source. You need to provide post Raj era sources by reliable authors, which must be verifiable. I have already mentioned in your talk page. Stop edit warring, or else you may be blocked from editing. Ekdalian (talk) 06:51, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

I'm not editing WRONG. I'm saying which is right. And i'm also not saying it on depending only one source. There are plenty of books like "kaula gyana nirnay", " Padma puran", "Harmala agam samhita", " Matsyendra charit" and many more, were nath's are addressed as Vedic Brahmin. you can read these books if you want. And about post raj era, you should read the whole "Ballal Charit" book once. you'll find all history about nath brahmins, from pre raj era to post raj era. And yeah, if you don’t want to believe it by deepening on these books then do research about this topic like i did. I'm also not saying this by depending only in books, but i really do an actual research. I asked many peoples who weren’t nath or Debnath cast, but know about it. I talked with some brahmins and also some history teachers of my university, who have good knowledge about this topic. And neither of them was Nath or Debnath. Almost all of them said that, Nath's are real Brahmin. I'm talking about "samsari nath's", who are not sanyasi.This is another topic. Sanyasi nath's are not brahmin. And they don't have any relation with the samsari nath's. There are Two kind of Nath. First is Samsari nath's, who are the real brahmin cast, and second is sanyasi nath's or The nath Sampraday, which is a different thing, the are not related with the samsari nath's. It's a branch of shivism.

And yeah, i don’t care you if block me. I'll always say the thing which is true.


 * We can understand you are new to Wikipedia. We don't bother whether you think you are right or wrong! Wikipedia follows it's own policies, and none of the sources mentioned can be cited here as a post Raj era reliable source. And original research is not allowed here, read WP:OR. Ekdalian (talk) 18:14, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi there!, and . FYI, the article has been expanded. Cheers. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 16:31, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
 * @Ekdalian The source does not represent any factual information. Kindly revert the edits. I am assuming you do not have any biases. It will be reported. @Tirtha Debnath @Ayush Bhattacharjee 77.64.140.81 (talk) 18:38, 8 December 2022 (UTC)