Talk:Deborah Hutton (Australian editor)

Untitled
This biog is written in a very biased way, probably by the subject herself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.68.140.219 (talk) 15:42, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Personal life
An editor has recently inserted (and then reinsterted) a personal life section that talks about two personal relationships. I deleted it when it was sourced to one dodgy article (I'll come to that) and it has been reinserted with citations to four articles. One of these is a dead link, for me at any rate. So: to the remaining three: Adelaide Now, Courier Mail and news.com.au. First of all, these are all news corp sites, and they add up to one actual reference (all published in the same 48 hour period) - so this is one source, not four. And what does it say. This quote gets the gold medal: "In the interview Hutton fails to make reference to the breakdown of her seven-year relationship with hockey player Danni Roche". What embarrassing bullshit from some apology for a journalist. Note the one key word "Fails". Note the rampant POV of the journo. Who actually has no facts, and now, still has no facts. Silver medal goes for this "Hutton, who once dated former Australian Hockeyroo Danni Roche..." unfortunately followed by this: "Hutton has never spoken publicly about her seven-year relationship with Roche". Oh, and then the bronze for this: "Allegedly broke off seven-year lesbian relationship". This is rubbish. They have absolutely no information other than gathered by trawling people's bins, their kerbs, their ex-friends and goodness knows what else. If someone has a reliable source that meets the policy on WP:BLP, feel free to bring it along. Otherwise, I'm again deleting the section on the grounds of the BLP policy on "Avoid gossip and feedback loops" and the presumption in favour of privacy. hamiltonstone (talk) 12:47, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

So she likes sniffing a bit of moot from time to time, that's hardly something to get uptight about.