Talk:Decade Volcanoes/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.'' In order to uphold the quality of Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of May 8, 2009, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GAR.

I'm re-evaling the article as part of the GA Sweeps. And to tell you the truth, it's not pretty. Unfortunalty, both the user who brought it to GAN, Worldtraveller, and the reviewer, CorbinSimpson are inactive and retired. Sadly, I am failing this article. Res Mar 13:26, 8 May 2009 (UTC) Well-written?: Factually accurate and verifiable?: Broad in its coverage:?: Neutral?: Stable?: Illustrated?:
 * The prose quality is a bit chuncky at times, especially in the lead, but adequate.
 * This, on which much of the article is based, is a dead link.
 * Could definetly use some expansion, as it is little more then an overview. However, this is adequate for GA.