Talk:Decentralized exchange

non-notable exchanges
As I understand, standard notability requirement for inclusion into lists in articles is having a Wikipedia article. Sometimes the requirement is relaxed to having significant coverage in independent reliable sources, that is qualifying for an article. I would suggest not to relax the requirement given the special situation with general sanctions on the topic. I see that most of entries in the list do not meet even the relaxed requirement. I propose to clean up this list to include exchanges with Wikipedia articles only. Retimuko (talk) 19:04, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ Џ 21:48, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ I've been working my best to keep this page informative, so I would be sad to see a lot of it go even for the greater good. I made a copy in my Sandbox in case I find the time to revisit and build articles on at least the more notable ones later, but for now I fully support the removal. Dr-Bracket (talk) 05:47, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I've gone ahead and removed it. As the creator of it, I should have been more weary of the notability guidelines and I see no reason to keep it up after this short discussion. If anyone objects or would like to work on sources to create notability on the exchanges, I've kept a copy on my Sandbox page. Dr-Bracket (talk) 17:10, 30 December 2018 (UTC)