Talk:Declan Napier/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: HJ Mitchell  |  Penny for your thoughts?   21:29, 7 March 2010 (UTC)


 * First thing that catches my eye is the image. I'd be surprised if it qualified as fair use.
 * Dates should not be open ended (2007-). Use something like "2010-present" or "2010 onwards".


 * ✅ avoid repetition of "role", especially in the lead
 * ✅ name "the series" for its first mention in "character creation"


 * I have some concerns over the references:
 * ✅The linking of them is inconsistent- you should link everything in the  field unless it doens;t have an article
 * They lack  fields which aren't essential for GA and publication dates which are
 * ✅ The Neighbours official website and Perfectblend are not reliable sources

I'm willing to leave this open as long as improvements are being made but you might struggle to find more reliable sources. ✅You could try imdb, which is marginally more reliable and I suggest a google news archive search for any newspaper articles etc that might help. HJ Mitchell |  Penny for your thoughts?   21:29, 7 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I changed the heading to "2007 onwards", the format advised by WP:OTHERDATE (part of the MoS). Although it's not one of the areas of the MoS required for GA, it's my opinion that it looks better than a dash (long or short). As for the image, the criteria only require that it's appropriately tagged, which it is, so, although it raises an eyebrow, it doesn't hold it back from GA. Thus, I'm happy to pass this. HJ Mitchell  |  Penny for your thoughts?   11:52, 9 March 2010 (UTC)