Talk:Declarative programming

vandalism
In the page-preview for the first mention of "SQL" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.161.137.88 (talk) 23:32, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

lisp and sml aren't declarative
lisp is imperative and sml is functional

this article reads like it's been lifted from a seo blogspam 206.191.44.34 (talk) 14:32, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Prolog example
The given example doesn't work as expected. Ordinary Prolog doesn't admit higher-order predicates, which are, however, used at e.g.  along with   I'm not sure whether the example can be fixed, or needs to be replaced. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 14:28, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

I came up with a version that I could get running in the expected way: After loading that code, the query  will succeed, while e.g.   will fail. However, I can't align this new code with the current pseudo-linguistic fuss about "set theory facts", "adjective facts ", and "relationships", which I suspect to be at best WP:OR, anyway. If there is no objection, I'll replace the example by just the bare code above. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 14:15, 3 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Please replace the psuedo-Prolog code by correct Prolog.
 * How did it get there? And how long has it been there? Shocking! 2.100.99.88 (talk) 21:32, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

History ...
Would be nice if this article had a history section. Gkochanowsky (talk) 07:15, 7 July 2023 (UTC)