Talk:Decline and fall of Pedro II of Brazil/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 07:10, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Reviewing. Pyrotec (talk) 07:10, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Initial comments
I've done a quick read through a couple of times to get an overall "flavour" of the article and it appears to be at or about GA-level. I'm, now working on the detailed review, and I'll be reporting mostly "problems", if and when I find them. This might take another day or so. Pyrotec (talk) 08:51, 13 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Don't worry, take your time. Also, thank you for reviewing it. Regards, --Lecen (talk) 11:31, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Overall summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:


 * I'm awarding this article GA-status. Congratulations on producing a fine article.

Pyrotec (talk) 08:31, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 * While it is not a GA-requirement, but it tends to be a WikiProject requirement, this article would benefit from a Info box. There is one, Infobox royalty, for instance, in Pedro I of Brazil that could be copied across and the data amended.
 * I see from the See also section that this is one of a series on Pedro II of Brazil, I've now awarded GA-status to two of them, perhaps a navigation box could be used to indicate the series rather than the See also listing.


 * Thank you for taking on this longer article, as well as for doing a thorough job of reviewing and the list of suggestions. &bull; Astynax talk 13:44, 14 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Indeed, thank you very much for taking your time to review the article. We are really grateful for what you've done. Kind regards, --Lecen (talk) 14:35, 14 April 2010 (UTC)