Talk:Decltype/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ruslik_ Zero 10:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) Please, expand the lead. Per WP:LEAD, the lead is a summary of the article. The current lead does not contain a summary of the first section (Motivation). I think the lead should consist of two paragraphs, where the first paragraph summarizes the first section.
 * 2) The article should make it clear what is the difference between 'typeof' and 'decltype'.
 * 3) Refs 2, 7, 9, 14 and 16 lack publisher information.

I found no other problems. Ruslik_ Zero 10:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reviewing, I'll do my best to correct the issues. decltype (talk) 10:30, 9 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I have expanded the lede slightly, with emphasis on summarizing the article. I could easily have written more, but tried to balance it with the overall size of the article. The point about typeof being a common name for different non-standard type-deducing operators, while decltype is _the_ standardized version has been explicitly made in the lede. I have added publisher information to the refs. Let me know if you have further suggestions for improvement, or are dissatisfied with the changes I made. decltype (talk) 11:18, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Well, the article is promoted. Ruslik_ Zero 19:35, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Again, thanks for reviewing. Regards, decltype (talk) 08:54, 10 November 2009 (UTC)