Talk:Deconstruction (building)

Untitled
The Building Materials Reuse Association will be having its next international conference on building deconstruction and materials reuse, May 14-16, 2007 at the University of Wisconsin - Madison, Memorial Union. Stayed tuned and look for more details at the BMRA website www.buildingreuse.org== POV ==

this:

''can potentially support communities by providing local jobs and renovated structures. Deconstruction employs 3-6 workers for every one employed in a comparable demolition job.''

implies that it is better when a particular work is done by more workers, which might be a POV. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.250.174.76 (talk) 20:25, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 October 2020 and 12 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mikemedina1. Peer reviewers: Vincentg1236, Captainmarc15.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Possible original research
It appears that large portions of this article (including the entire section on typical methods of deconstruction as it stands today) was written by a single editor, without citing any sources,. Unfortunately, I'm not familiar at all with the subject matter, but I'm flagging this in the hopes that someone who is can take a stab at cleaning this article up. --Amlz (talk) 07:32, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Imo, I would probably rewrite the entire article from scratch and then send it as a new article under the same name, and then copy that successful new article back. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 20:52, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * There are a decent number of editors on this page, and a good number of references. Do you have any particular sentences or paragraphs of the article you have an issue with? I am at least decently familiar with the subject. Centerone (talk) 20:39, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I would focus on sections that contain sentences with contested verification, specifically due to a lack of citations attached nearby, especially on the Deconstruction (building) section which has zero citations. In general, a paragraph with zero citations probably needs at least one citation to back up the content there, and any sentences that may seem contested by a person who is unfamiliar with the topic should receive an appropriate citation to backup the point(s). Another noteworthy thing to consider is making the article sound a little less like an essay; it's nice that it does contain a lot of helpful information, but I think Wikipedia is more about telling the main points rather than sounding like something one would say as a lecturer, or instance. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 02:07, 2 October 2022 (UTC)