Talk:Decree nisi

Italics or not?
I suspect not, in which case the italics in the "usages" section need to go. If it is supposed to be italicised, then it should be throughout. Huw Powell (talk) 15:45, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, Chambers does not italicise it. Huw Powell (talk) 15:46, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Decree nisi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100622083458/http://www.opsi.gov.uk:80/revisedstatutes/acts/ukpga/1973/plain/cukpga_19730018_en to http://www.opsi.gov.uk/RevisedStatutes/Acts/ukpga/1973/plain/cukpga_19730018_en#pt1-pb1-l1g1-l1p1-l2p5

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:36, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Opening sentence was wrong way around
I've restored my edit. As is clear from the subsequent text, a decree nisi will become absolute by default, *unless* it can be shown that the decree is faulty in some way. The previous text suggested that by default, a decree nisi would not become absolute.

https://thelawdictionary.org/decree-nisi/


 * OK -- I've clarified what you wrote; I think you just missed that one word that needed to be changed. That was why I originally reverted -- I couldn't tell what you intended. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 09:57, 14 November 2018 (UTC)