Talk:Deese–Roediger–McDermott paradigm/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Smallman12q (talk · contribs) 00:37, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

While the article is well-sourced, it requires a thorough copyedit to meet GA standards.

Comments Smallman12q (talk) 00:37, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
 * There are only 3 wikilinks in the text...this is insufficient. Please add more wikilinks.
 * Rather than using "Fabiani et. al (2000) " you should described the study in a sentence..."A study at X university, by X researchers conducted in X year found...X"
 * The tone is a bit off in places...reading like an essay. For example "The question of why the DRM paradigm still remains. " should be something like "The cause of the DRM paradigm is not fully understood and is the subject of ongoing psychological studies."
 * Where possible, terms should be defined where they are used...not after as in "The above explanation is known as activation monitoring theory."
 * There are some grammer errors such as "The wanted to determine the..."...should be "They wanted to determine the..."
 * -Issues went unaddressed.Smallman12q (talk) 17:23, 14 December 2011 (UTC)