Talk:Defence-class ironclad/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 10:59, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Will review later today. Miyagawa (talk) 10:59, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Ok, now for the review:


 * Background: I understand what you mean by "French ironclads then building" but would something like "then under construction" be easier for the reader?
 * Also - any information on just how much cheaper they were than the Warriors? I'd be interested if it was aligned with the consideration of combat output - after all if they were only worth 1/4 of a Warrior in terms out output, but cost 1/4 of a Warrior then it actually make sense.

That is all I can spot - so once those couple of points are sorted I think this is a straight forward pass. Miyagawa (talk) 16:56, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Revised the background para with the price of the Warriors added as well as your other suggested change.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:38, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Great, I'm happy that this meets the GA requirements. Miyagawa (talk) 18:33, 29 September 2013 (UTC)