Talk:Definitions of philosophy/Archives/2024/February

Redundancy of this article
As I recall, long ago we had a "definition of philosophy" article, which it was decided to merge into Metaphilosophy. Is there a good reason why this article needs to exist rather than just expanding on that article? If is still around he's probably got some input as he was heavily involved in all that back then. --Pfhorrest (talk) 16:25, 16 February 2022 (UTC)


 * I guess its a question both of notability and of the amount of content. I think both factors justify a separate treatment: there are many reliable sources that specifically concern this topic (for example, see the sources cited in the article or try searching "What is philosophy" on google scholar) and there is a lot of content to be covered. Metaphilosophy, on the other hand, covers various other topics as well, such as investigating the different philosophical methods and the value or usefulness of philosophy. Phlsph7 (talk) 16:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)


 * I'm just coming back from a six month break - ironically setting up a wiki :-)  I'm inclined to say that this article would have value with a rewrite - that is to say more or less a list of the various definitions and their sources without commentary (the sort of thing Phlsph7 has the knowledge and energy to do.  From memory there were a few articles that were in effect coatracks so it might be time for a tidy up. -Snowded TALK 06:48, 17 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Currently, the article does not present a list but describes, among other things, different types of definitions together with some examples for each. The commentary is important on such an approach to explain the context and the criticism they received by other philosophers. This is how many reliable sources deal with this topic and it has the advantage of giving an actual overview instead of just a list of unrelated characterizations. I think this approach is more useful, especially given that there are so many individual definitions of philosophy: many philosophers, past and present, each have their own unique definition. But a historical section focusing more on the individual definitions without much emphasis on the critical evaluation of each one could be a valuable addition. Such a section might play the role you intended for the list. Phlsph7 (talk) 10:49, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Science
Definition of philosophy 2001:4450:81BF:C400:59F4:E7E3:488:417E (talk) 12:04, 2 September 2022 (UTC)