Talk:Dei delitti e delle pene

Rewrite
The most important part about this writing is not its stance or effect on the death penalty. This article requires a rewrite, and must include many of the other excellent points and philosophical beliefs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.185.10.3 (talk) 04:58, March 21, 2007 76.185.10.3
 * Agree - this article misses the point entirely, and does need a rewrite to properly reflect the real significance: deterrance theory.  /Blaxthos 16:59, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The article no longer appears to be primarily about the death penalty, so perhaps this objection has been addressed, and the tag can be removed?
 * However there's a glaring deficiency in the article, which is that it is effectively unreferenced. There are two items in the "references" section, but both point to the work itself.  That means there are no secondary sources cited at all.  This would be a defect in any WP article, but it's especially serious in an article about the work representing the only cited source. --Trovatore (talk) 00:18, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Original research
The article needs to cite secondary and tertiary sources to comply with No original research. joye (talk) 21:44, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Reinstated the tags noting both the concerns in this section and the one above. //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 23:55, 25 February 2010 (UTC)