Talk:Dekalog

Review
I took out the link to the NY press article. Dan Schneider appears to be using wikipedia to plug links to his own articles, and has done so on many occasions.(StevenEdmondson (talk) 14:53, 27 August 2008 (UTC)).

Fair use rationale for Image:The decalogue cover.jpg
Image:The decalogue cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

1988 or 1989?
This has recently been changed from 1988 to 1989.

There is a confusion over the appropriate year Dekalog emerged. Though the Venice Film Festival of 1989 is given as the premiere on the Artificial Eye page for 1-5, that page and the one for 6-10 indicate "Poland 1988" in a sidebar, presumably 1988 was the copyright year. The International Movie Database suggests 1989 for Poland, the earlist date it gives. What to do? Philip Cross (talk) 14:34, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * It first aired on Polish TV in December 1989, and the season continued until spring 1990 with a new episode airing each week. It most definitely is a 1989 series. Lhw1 (talk) 18:00, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Episodes
They are not named after its corresponding Commandment. Many episodes cover several commandments in one. I deleted the names, please don't revert them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.14.150.229 (talk) 03:43, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree with this editor. The episodes are not associated with a single commandment each; there is not a one-to-one correspondence. ~ Lhynard (talk) 21:36, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Episode outlines
I propose that individual episode outlines be restored. Not necessarily as before, they might be cut over the old version because of the new individual articles, but the potential reader has no means of being correctly directed to the appropriate episode without a good memory or prior knowledge. It is the usual WP practice to precis secondary pieces in the master articles. Philip Cross (talk) 16:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Requested move 3 August 2016

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa (talk) 17:26, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

The Decalogue (TV series) → Dekalog – We should use the most WP:COMMONNAME in the English-speaking world. Now, references to the series in the US appear to have shifted to the Polish title (and the current home video release has, too), and since the US was the only country using the English title before, it's pretty clear now that the common name is Dekalog. —  Film Fan  13:21, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Support Was surprised to see it wasn't at Dekalog already. The DVD release I have in the UK uses this spelling and I've never seen it spelt as it is currently titled.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 07:15, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Support. Although it does appear to have been released under this title before, Dekalog is now the WP:COMMONNAME.  --Rob Sinden (talk) 14:51, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Dekalog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120307030723/http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/feature/63 to http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/feature/63
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060720142105/http://artsandfaith.com:80/top100/ to http://artsandfaith.com/top100/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Dekalog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100724173154/http://www.facets.org/decalogue/biography.html to http://www.facets.org/decalogue/biography.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100724165722/http://www.facets.org/decalogue/reviews.html to http://www.facets.org/decalogue/reviews.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100725120727/http://www.facets.org/decalogue/cinematographers.html to http://www.facets.org/decalogue/cinematographers.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100724165722/http://www.facets.org/decalogue/reviews.html to http://www.facets.org/decalogue/reviews.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://artsandfaith.com/t100/2005/entry.php?film=19
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.artsandfaith.com/t100/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Budget
The infobox shows an overall budget of $100,000 for all ten parts. Does anyone have a source for this? I have marked it as needing a citation. The individual Wikipedia episode entries show a budget of $10,000 for each part, with the exception of episode Five (Killing), which shows a budget of $400,000. This must be an error, and I have amended it to $10,000. Masato.harada (talk)