Talk:Delaware Route 11/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 10:39, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Basically the article is fine but some of the prose could be clarified.
 * I've read this article and will review it shortly. It is well written. MathewTownsend (talk) 10:39, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * review


 * "DE 11 was created by 1936 on a road taken over by the state by 1931." - can this be clearer?
 * Reworded.  Dough 48  72  22:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * "DE 11 begins at the Maryland border in western Kent County, where MD 302 continues to the west towards Templeville, Maryland" - so here the road split? MD 302 goes west, and DE 11 heads northeast?
 * The road that carries DE 11 crosses the border into Maryland and the route becomes MD 302. Clarified.  Dough 48  72  22:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * "In the center of Hartly, the route crosses DE 44. After DE 44, the road heads north before curving northeast and leaving Hartly." - something like "In the center of Hartly, the route crosses DE 44, then heads north before it curves northeast and leaves Hartly."?
 * Reworded.  Dough 48  72  22:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * "and passing a few homes." - passes a few homes
 * Reworded.  Dough 48  72  22:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * "before coming to " - it comes to an end
 * Changed.  Dough 48  72  22:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * In the "History" section: "by 1920", "by 1931", "by 1936" - its a little clumsy - perhaps there's no other way to phrase this.
 * That's the best way to phrase it as the changes happened by those dates.  Dough 48  72  22:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

These are suggestions to improve the prose. I made an edit.

MathewTownsend (talk) 22:20, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review, I have replied to the above comments.  Dough 48  72  22:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * reply
 * Great! I just made one more little edit for the sake of prose.

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:
 * B. Complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Provides references to all sources:
 * B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Main aspects are addressed:
 * B. Remains focused:
 * 1) Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass!
 * Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 23:00, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass!
 * Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 23:00, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass!
 * Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 23:00, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 23:00, 3 July 2012 (UTC)