Talk:Delaware Route 36/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Aviyal (talk · contribs) 21:13, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Failed "good article" nomination
This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of February 25, 2012, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: Symbol_unsupport_vote.svg
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Symbol_unsupport_vote.svg
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: Symbol support vote.svg
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Symbol_unsupport_vote.svg
 * 5. Article stability?: Symbol_unsupport_vote.svg
 * 6. Images?: Symbol support vote.svg

Doesn't feel like it blends with the criteria. Try and this article better e.g. History needs more information, better reference needed

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— /\ talk←   Aviyal   →Policy ) /\ 21:13, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Furthermore
The article is very close to a GA qualification but it still need to be more accurate to the point of the article. The article covers almost all of it's topics but I believe that it can be better written with the help of a specialist. Also, the article contail a dead link to Scotts Corner, you can say that it isn't dependent to the article but still it refers about Delaware Route 36. /\ talk←   Aviyal   →Policy ) /\ 21:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

He is a specialist in writing about such roads.♦ Dr. Blofeld  22:13, 26 February 2012 (UTC)