Talk:Delaware Route 62/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 16:34, 10 February 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Dabs and ELs look good.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Looks good.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Looks good as well.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Given the length of this highway, the content could be padded slightly with the AADT and NHS information.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Rare to see otherwise in highway articles.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * I fixed the caption for you because it wasn't a full sentence, it didn't need a period.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I'm passing, but still recommending that the above suggestion be implemented.  Imzadi 1979  →   17:19, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm passing, but still recommending that the above suggestion be implemented.  Imzadi 1979  →   17:19, 10 February 2012 (UTC)