Talk:Delimiter/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

To uphold the quality of Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of February 21, 2010, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GAR.

Reviewer: --Malleus Fatuorum 16:04, 21 February 2010 (UTC)


 * This article is almost entirely unreferenced, and what is equally a problem is that it makes frequent use of citations to other uncited wikipedia articles, such as citation #9 to Curly bracket programming language. In many parts it reads like a personal essay.


 * References
 * There is one dead link.


 * All citations should provide full details, including publisher and last accessdate.


 * What is citation #19 (Friedl infra)? If it's another reference to Friedl (2002) then the footnotes and bibliography ought to be separated.