Talk:Delta Cancri

Arkushanangarushashutu?
From Star Names: Their Lore and Meaning which is an unreliable source. Citation needed but not Allen. Rursus dixit. ( m bork3 !) 12:03, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Delta Cancri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716072234/http://www.astro.illinois.edu/~jkaler/sow/asellusbor.html to http://www.astro.illinois.edu/~jkaler/sow/asellusbor.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:21, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Delta Cancri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100811014924/http://www.lcsd.gov.hk/CE/Museum/Space/Research/StarName/c_research_chinengstars_ama_b.htm to http://www.lcsd.gov.hk/CE/Museum/Space/Research/StarName/c_research_chinengstars_ama_b.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Binarity
Another problem binary. The WDS entry lists a discovery code of 'TOK 3' for A. A. Tokovinin with an observation date of 1982, but I don't see the star in those referenced papers. The Eggleton and Tokovinin (2008) say it is a single star. Hartkopf and McAlister (1984) do list this as an unresolved binary. I'm not sure how to resolve this, so I'll just leave this as a note. Praemonitus (talk) 21:06, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * There are two optical companions, or one double optical companion if you want to look at it that way. The suspected binary companion is mentioned in, but the observation is described as unreliable.  The title of the work is a bit garbled and it has also been listed as  which I couldn't find.  TOK 3 incorrectly indicates part I of the series which doesn't mention this star?  Nothing since, which seems to have been taken as meaning it doesn't exist.  Lithopsian (talk) 18:36, 18 June 2021 (UTC)