Talk:Demeter International

This article has no references at all
This article has no references at all. It is in violation of the arbitration rulings concerning anthroposophy-related articles and has been so for months. If adequate, non-anthroposophical sources are not cited in the next week or so, I will propose it (again) for deletion.DianaW 14:23, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Improving this article will not be hard. I read the comments in the delete review and they found it worth keeping. It just needs editing. I can do some work on it myself. signed Micowrysea

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Demeter International. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120207122045/http://crdi.org/uploads/user-S/11278532171sci_coffee_labelling.pdf to http://crdi.org/uploads/user-S/11278532171sci_coffee_labelling.pdf
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://biodynamic.org.nz/demeter.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:06, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Demeter International. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070730185553/http://demeter-usa.org/?page_id=5 to http://demeter-usa.org/?page_id=5

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:02, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Opinion/Marketing Claim in article
Is it just me or does this seem like a marketing claim or opinion? "The certification verifies the fulfillment of the standards on behalf of the farmers, which in turn guarantees high quality food products to the consumers." Specifically "guarantees high quality food products" seems like it either needs a source or is a marketing claim. 141.70.80.5 (talk) 08:37, 4 December 2020 (UTC)