Talk:Demographics of Morocco

old data
Looking on Status of Women I read about women not going to school, but the world bank says there is a 97% enrolment in 2018. Those that finish primary school is 94%. So I don't know how boys can be 28 times more presented than girls?

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.PRM.TENR.FE?locations=MA — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.214.114.140 (talk) 14:01, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

October 2023
You need to make up your mind: either the statement is about culture or ethnicity; and please, refrain from edit warring.

The context is clearly to do with ethnicity this contradicts your earlier statement “Arabised” is in reference to culture, not ethnicity..

You clearly also don’t understand what Arabised even means enlighten me. M.Bitton (talk) 20:43, 8 October 2023 (UTC)


 * It’s clear to me you have a problem reading or understanding basic words. The context is about ethnicity, that most Moroccans are indigenous Berbers (Berbers are an ETHNICITY), many of which (not all) are “Arabised” (a term used for people who are “culturally Arab”, but are NOT ethnically Arab). I’ve made my point. Not going to repeat myself. Hero7373 (talk) 21:21, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * What is clear to you is obviously your problem.
 * “culturally Arab”, but are NOT ethnically Arab what is the difference between the two? M.Bitton (talk) 21:32, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

"Moors" in infobox
Belated follow up on this & this. Courtesy ping to @Ibrahim Alkaseer and @Skitash.

The word "Moors" in English is an old exonym that can refer to roughly any or all North Africans, Andalusis, etc (a bit like Saracens referring to Arabs and/or Muslims). Its use here is confusing. The word is linked to Beidane; assuming this is correct, then per MOS:EASTEREGG it's preferable to just use that term. Any WP:COMMONNAME issues might be better discussed at that article. The cited source, Britannica, uses the term "Mauritanian Moors", which would be fine too. I've seen both used in current news/documents. R Prazeres (talk) 20:28, 22 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your input, and I agree. Skitash (talk) 21:21, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Vital statistics table
How can TFR stay about the same if births declined by about 100k from 2022 to 2023? Chaptagai (talk) 06:01, 30 June 2024 (UTC)