Talk:Demolition waste

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Se626314.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:17, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Evaluation for PBIO 4180J
Is the material organized and focused? Are there several headings and subheadings? Is the presentation understandable?
 * The material is somewhat focused; all the information provided is on topic.
 * There are currently no headings or subheadings separating information; just separate paragraphs.
 * The article is understandable with very little background information.
 * There is not enough specific information for there to be proper organization.

What is the quality of the evidence? Does the article have references or is it just someone’s knowledge? Are the references reliable sources? Why or why not. Were assumptions made?
 * Only one line of the stub is cited to a broken link. The article is a majority someone’s knowledge or is just cited inaccurately.
 * If the link worked correctly, the National Safety Council would be a neutral, reputable source. The National Safety is a long-established nonprofit that works to reduce the number of preventable deaths using researched methods.

Does the article have an introduction? Is the introduction understandable and does it summarize the article’s key points? Does the article cover the topic comprehensively, partially, or is it an overview? Is there anything missing/How might the content be improved? Are there images and diagrams at appropriate places, and appendices and footnotes at the end?
 * The introduction is clear, concise, and understandable without prior knowledge on the subject.
 * The article it a very simple overview, there is no in-depth information.
 * The content can be improved by adding detailed information from credible sources.
 * Some aspects of the article to expand on include details about the composition of demolition waste, adding more information about processing the major components, and currently utilized recycling techniques.
 * There is a single image that is placed nicely, but more images may be beneficial.
 * There are no footnotes or appendices.

Is the coverage neutral (unbiased)? Are facts emphasized?
 * The article is currently written with unbiased, neutral language.
 * Without references, it is hard to know if the statements made in the article are based on facts.

Se626314 (talk) 11:33, 26 October 2017 (UTC)