Talk:Demyansk Pocket

Untitled
"However, their struggle had denied the Soviet High Command numerous units at a critical moment, units that would have otherwise been used elsewhere." If possible to quote this? Stopping german army there is less critical than at another place? I am a bit confused, if possible to get clarification on this matter? "Used elsewhere" to do what? If it is fighting Germans than I fail to see the point of this quote. Sincerely appreciate you looking into this.

MKb 42
The deployment of the Mkb42 in this battle is highly disputed, and at the very least should be cited with a source. Production and testing records seem to suggest that it was tested in late 1942, and could not have been part of this battle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.202.195.199 (talk) 23:10, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

disputed by deniers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.163.217.46 (talk) 15:17, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

2nd Shock Army
Hi!) You fool) Sorry for my engl) Vlasov and 2 Shock Army - Volhov front general-colonel Hozin.   Demiansk - North-West front. general Kurochkin) If you need russian help about WII ask me)

Nothing dealing with the fate of the 2nd Army after the Demiansk Pocket was opened? JonCatalan 14:54, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Demyansk Pocket
Are there any maps available which would illustrate this article?

Stalingard
Can we remove the last paragraph and instead offer a link to supply troubles at Stalingard? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.163.20.232 (talk) 15:08, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Demyansk Pocket. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151228032412/http://ww2stats.com/cas_ger_okh_dec42.html to http://ww2stats.com/cas_ger_okh_dec42.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080224022418/http://victory.mil.ru/lib/books/h/nwf/index.html to http://victory.mil.ru/lib/books/h/nwf/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:14, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

contradictory casualties
"64,000 of whom were either killed, wounded or too sick for service" contradicts the figures at the start of the section by a factor of five.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  05:29, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

In fact, hows it possible that according to the source provided, soviet losses for the entire front during that time were 272 thousand but according to someone who wrote an article entirely and exclusively from the point of view of the Axis, the soviets lost more men in a single pocket operation than they lost in the entire western front on the same period?

Is Wikipedia a place that checks their sources, or do people deliberatly search for non-english works in the hopes that no one bothers to question their numbers? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.62.119.217 (talk) 15:57, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Göring didn't influence Hitler to rely on an airlift to assist Stalingrad
It was Luftwaffe chief of staff Hans Jeschonnek Glantz and House Stalingrad Volume p270-271 Hayward Stopped at Stalingrad p233-234 Fritz Ostkrieg p311 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1206:4576:B40:1525:B9AA:60D6:1CE1 (talk) 17:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC)