Talk:Denis Eden

Moving page
Hi, I was just thinking that there is not another page called Denis Eden on Wikipedia so I do not think there is any need to call the page "Denis Eden (painter)". Couldn't we just call it "Denis Eden"? JamCor (talk) 07:18, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Done. KJP1 (talk) 08:55, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Good Article nomination
This is a strong first GA nomination, congratulations. However, I think it is likely that a reviewer will find a few issues, so have taken the liberty of making some suggestions below:


 * Bare URLs - there are many of these and they aren't a good look. They are fairly easy to rectify using this, ;
 * Citations - there are quite a lot of para.s that end without citations, which is rather frowned upon;
 * Citations v footnotes - you mix the two, e.g., Ref.3 isn't a citation, in that it doesn't enable verification, rather it's an expansion. You could consider splitting the two types;
 * Reliable sources - I don't think Ancestry.co.uk (multiple appearances) fits this bill? Nor an email (Ref.118). Nor Wikipedia (Ref.34);
 * Original research? - e.g. Ref.57, Ref.93;
 * Embedded external links - we don't use these, e.g. Ref.58, which doesn't work;
 * Subject - it is actually almost a dual biography of both Denis and Helen;
 * Sections - I don't personally find the section headings very helpful. Would a chronological or thematic approach be more helpful to the reader?

Hope these thoughts are of some use. KJP1 (talk) 09:32, 4 July 2021 (UTC)