Talk:Denis Kapustin (militant)

His opinions about himself must remain outside the lede
His opinions can at most be reported in the body of the article, in the lede one must report what the sources say about him. "He has been described in Russian media as a Neo-Nazi, but describes himself as a Traditionalist". The second part goes into the body (if not deleted). Mhorg (talk) 14:44, 26 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Not sure if it should go in the lede but per WP:BLP we are supposed to include denials Tristario (talk) 00:29, 27 May 2023 (UTC)


 * I agree with Mhorg about it. My very best wishes (talk) 17:34, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I am looking at recent POV changes by IP ("He is deeply rooted in ... hooliganism", etc.)... My very best wishes (talk) 03:18, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Chocolate chip cookies.jpg]]

Yes, please look but above all read! --91.54.16.205 (talk) 06:35, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Well, my personal inclination would be keep only far-right in the lead. This is because "far-right" includes "neo-Nazi". As our page correctly says, "Historically, "far-right politics" has been used to describe the experiences of fascism, Nazism, and Falangism. Contemporary definitions now include neo-fascism, neo-Nazism, the Third Position, the alt-right, racial supremacism and other ideologies or organizations that feature aspects of authoritarian, ultra-nationalist, chauvinist, xenophobic, theocratic, racist, homophobic, transphobic, and/or reactionary views". Otherwise, I am OK with the current version of the page. My very best wishes (talk) 23:26, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * @My very best wishes Do you have any irrefutable evidence that Denis Kapustin actually represents such views? Bociek O-le (talk) 09:36, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * If you read his telegram page (https://t.me/white_powder2020), you can find that he often makes LGBTQI-phobic, Antisemetic and Generally racist posts on an almost daily basis. So I think that he at least fits in as at least an anti putin conservative ultranationalist. 77.194.42.107 (talk) 10:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Recent edit
Preserving here by providing this link. Russia labeled Kapustin a terrorist is not supported by sources; Washington Post describes RU referring to cross-border raids as terrorism (not Kapustin himself); zn.ua does not mention terrorism. -- K.e.coffman (talk) 08:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Kapustin is de facto a Terrorist because he is carrying out Terrorist attacks, but in opposite to Terrorists of Hamas he is doing that by order of NATO.--88.65.182.62 (talk) 15:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
 * What do you mean by "he is doing that by order of NATO" ?
 * The unit that he leads isn't armed by NATO, contrary to the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The Command of the units is either done by themselves or by the GUR, who is known to cause conflict with US diplomacy notably on the use of kamikaze drones to destroy russian refineries. 77.194.42.107 (talk) 10:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)