Talk:Dennis E. Puleston

Untitled
Hello,

I believe I have addressed the note on this page. If there is more to do, I need to do it this weekend. This is a plea for specific help or the clearence of the notes attached to the page. Please help me get this remedied. It is not only an important subject, but also a big grade in a graduate level class. (Cakerkela (talk) 00:53, 18 November 2011 (UTC))
 * I left a message on my talk page, and removed most of the tags. Keep in mind, Wikipedia isn't a platform for better grades, it is an encyclopedia and we have a very specific tone, which may or may not be the same as you are shooting for in your school project.  For instance, we don't allow essays on Wikipedia.  Please read WP:NOT for more clarity than I can muster.  Dennis Brown (talk) 01:08, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the help. Through reading the WP:NOT page, I believe that the remaining issues must lie in the depth of the material covered (specifically in the ramon study section. As one who is actively engaged in follow up work on the subject, i am having a difficult time deciding on what can be removed without marginalizing Puleston's argument -- one that is unique and influences much of the field of archaeology. I will try to trim it down this weekend, but I could use any help that anyone reading could give on this matter. (Cakerkela (talk) 14:42, 18 November 2011 (UTC))