Talk:Denticle

Untitled
Editing Talk:Denticle From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Wikipedia does not have a talk page with this exact title.

To start a page called Talk:Denticle, type in the box below. When you are done, preview the page to check for errors and then save it.

This is a talk page. Please respect the talk page guidelines, and remember to sign your posts by typing four tildes (108.85.7.84 (talk) 23:20, 25 April 2011 (UTC)). You are not currently logged in. If you save any edits, your IP address will be recorded publicly in this page's edit history. If you create an account, you can conceal your IP address and be provided with many other benefits. Messages sent to your IP can be viewed on your talk page.

Please do not save test edits. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you need any help getting started with editing, see the New contributors' help page. BoldItalic Embedded fileSignature and timestampLink AdvancedSpecial charactersHelpCite

Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted. Encyclopedic content must be verifiable.

By clicking the "Save Page" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license. Edit summary (Briefly describe the changes you have made) Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)

If you do not want your writing to be edited, used, and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here. All text that you did not write yourself, except brief excerpts, must be available under terms consistent with Wikipedia's Terms of Use before you submit it.

– — ‘’ “” ° ″ ′ ≈ ≠ ≤ ≥ ± − × ÷ √ ← → · §  Sign your posts on talk pages: 108.85.7.84 (talk) 23:20, 25 April 2011 (UTC)   Cite your sources:

Please note:

When you click Save, your changes will immediately become visible to everyone. If you wish to run a test, please edit the Sandbox instead. Please post only encyclopedic information that can be verified by external sources. Please maintain a neutral, unbiased point of view. Please do not copy and paste from copyrighted websites – only public domain resources can be copied without permission.

Log in / create account

Article Discussion

Create New section

Main page Contents Featured content Current events Random article Donate to Wikipedia

Interaction

Help About Wikipedia Community portal Recent changes Contact Wikipedia

Toolbox

Primary topic
as you seem to be knowledgeable on the subject matter here, would you consider either of the two entries (probably the pulp stone, based on the incoming links) to be the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for denticle? If so, we would have a TWODAB situation and could make this page into a redirect. And I think either way I'll try to start fixing up the incoming links.&#32;-- Fyrael (talk) 18:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)


 * So this is kind of tricky because "denticle" (Latin for "little tooth") is sometimes used as a general dictionary word in biology to refer to pretty much any tooth-like or bristle-like structure. But it also has several specific usages that warrant their own articles (or at least sections). One particularly common usage that warrants its own description are the dermal denticles of cartilaginous fish, which is currently a redirect to Fish scale. I would say the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC cannot be decided between the general usage and dermal denticle. The other two uses - Pulp stone (tooth) and a dinosaur tooth feature (see below) - do not seem to be primary topics, but I also know less about those uses, so I may be biased.


 * Re fixing incoming links,I have resolved all denticle links that refer to dermal denticle by pointing them at that redirect, so I think that case is resolved. All the links to this page that remain fall into two categories:
 * A feature of dinosaur teeth, apparently (definitely distinct from Pulp stone (tooth). I have no idea what this is, but it seems to be a sort of serration rather than a tooth or bristle-like structure. This likely warrants its own article (something like Denticle (dinosaur tooth)), and I am looking into it.
 * The general use of the term to refer to any tooth-like or bristle-like structure on an animal that is not specifically a dermal denticle or dinosaur tooth feature. My plan was to not resolve these links, since the sentence at the top of this page is about all we can say in these cases. Is this an acceptable solution?


 * Finally, I think Pulp stone (tooth) is definitely not the primary topic here, although my experience is more with biology than dentistry, so perhaps I am biased. It is worth noting that of the dental sources mentioning "denticle" I've seen, most use "pulp stone" primarily and all at least mention it, while the biology use of "denticle" has no substitute. I did not find any links to denticle that could be resolved to Pulp stone (tooth). The large number of incoming links to Pulp stone (tooth) is an artifact of the widespread transclusion of Template:Oral pathology.


 * Let me know what you think of how I have been sorting this out, and if you have any questions or suggestions for how I could go about it better. A2soup (talk) 19:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

An update: I have created Denticle (tooth feature) (which I discussed above) and pointed all of the applicable links to it. The remaining links to denticle use it in the general sense, although there are likely other specialized uses with their own particular meaning (e.g. in entomology). Is it okay to maintain links to a dab page that gives a general definition as its first line? Or should the links go to Wikitionary instead, or perhaps be removed and replaced a clarifying appositive in the article? A2soup (talk) 05:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)