Talk:Department of War Studies, King's College London

Advertising tag, factual accuracy
This article reads like it was written by someone who is more familiar with the vague, advertising-like style of press releases and corporate self-descriptions that with the neutral, factual style of encyclopedias, and in particular Wikipedia's NPOV policy. Peacock terms are used throughout ("world leader", "numerous leading", "boasts", "many", "regularly").

In addition, the accuracy of some sentences - as far as they correspond to actual, verifiable statements - is dubious. Example: The claim that it is "considered a world leader in the quality of its work output, as well as for the career prospects of its graduates." The last source only support the statement that the KCL's whole politics department (not the Department of War Studies) came third (not top) in one nationwide (not worldwide) general ranking (considering the relevant "Job after 6 mths" stat, only fifth) by one newspaper (not in the general public opinion).

Considering that the contributions of the article's author focus exclusively on the KCL Department of War Studies, it seems worthwhile to note Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines.

Regards, HaeB (talk) 22:54, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Department of War Studies, King's College London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140121043821/http://www.kingscollections.org/catalogues/kclca/collection/k/10ki4655 to http://www.kingscollections.org/catalogues/kclca/collection/k/10ki4655

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:34, 11 December 2016 (UTC)