Talk:Deriba (caldera)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 14:23, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

This looks an interesting article about a subject that takes me back to research I was involved in a long time ago on geological features. I will start a review shortly. simongraham (talk) 14:23, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Review
The article is clearly written and covers an interesting topic. It is stable, 95% of authorship is one user, Jo-Jo Eumerus. It was ranked a 'Start article in 5 June 2010‎ but saw substantial development since a page move in 2018.


 * All images are either licensed under Creative Commons or are within the Public Domain in the United States.


 * The text is clear uses language appropriate for the audience.


 * The References are inconsistent. Please make all the citations follow the same format as per MOS:CITE. I suggest using the convention already used for Vail 1972 and Wickens 1975. This means changing Issawi & Sallam 2017, Fott & Karim 1973, Maley 2000, Soulié-Märsche et al 2010, Francis et al 1973, Davidson & Wilson 1989, Newhall & Dzurisin 1983 etc to meet the same format, with a separate short footnote and citation.

Congratulations on your work on this article. Please ping me when you have had a chance to review these minor amendments and I will complete the assessment. simongraham (talk) 07:05, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * See, to my understanding this is an acceptable way to format references when for some you use only one page and for others multiple pages. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:06, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I disagree but I am not going to push the point as I think the GA criterion is open to interpretation. simongraham (talk) 19:08, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Assessment
The six good article criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonable well written
 * the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
 * it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead, layout and word choice.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable
 * it contains a reference section, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
 * all inline citations are from reliable sources;
 * it contains no original research;
 * it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage
 * it addresses the main aspects of the topic;
 * it stays ffocused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.
 * 1) It has a neutral point of view
 * it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.
 * 1) It is stable
 * it does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content;
 * images are (relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Congratulations. This article meets the criteria to be a Good Article. simongraham (talk) 19:11, 14 July 2021 (UTC)