Talk:Desborough

Is personal opinion allowed/desirable on Wikipedia pages?
This article about Desborough has an entry about new developments including a business park. The author suggests that this development would be a mistake but, but that is a matter of opinion not fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by John F (talk • contribs) 23:27, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Lack of citation and references.
I have added some citation templates due to the general lack of citations. XKronikz (talk) 00:39, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

August 2017 rewrite
I've done some rewriting and restructuring of this article to try and make it more encyclopaedic and more structured. I've removed duplication and added some new references. I've also removed a lot of content which gave a running commentary on various recent developments and the sagas of some non-developments, and didn't really belong in an encyclopaedia. More work needs doing, because the referencing and structure are still weak but hopefully this is a start, Neiltonks (talk) 13:09, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

I like your version. Bmcln1 (talk) 13:34, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Desborough. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130225191756/http://www.desboroughtowncouncil.gov.uk/Core/Desborough-Tc/Pages/Desborough_Town_Council_1.aspx to http://www.desboroughtowncouncil.gov.uk/Core/Desborough-Tc/Pages/Desborough_Town_Council_1.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:19, 30 November 2017 (UTC)