Talk:Design sprint

“The heart of Scrum is a Sprint, a time-box of one month or less during which a ‘Done’, usable, and potentially releasable product Increment is created.” "Each Sprint has a definition of what is to be built, a design and flexible plan that will guide building it, the work, and the resultant product." - Official Scrum Guide (Scrum.org)

A 'Design Sprint' then not a Sprint, as it implies that not all of the definitions of a Sprint are being implemented. Both words used together creates a paradox. As described in this Wiki page, It is more similar to a Design Phase (such as exists in Waterfall processes). By that definition it isn't Agile. The use of the word 'Sprint' implies however that is Scrum or Agile. Instead acts as a facade in order to hide a Waterfall practise.

Shouldn't the official definition of what a Sprint implies be included?