Talk:Desmond Doyle

Untitled
I'm really concerned about this article but do not have any knowledge other than the film and Evelyn Doyle's book to go off. Of course, the film could be very skewed and Evelyn's account need not be accurate either, but what is a certainty is that the article neither references the major salient points made in it nor does the manner of its composition imply much faith, given in particular the number of typographical/spelling errors.

Films are notoriously massaged for dramatic effect, autobiographical books often are, but the discrepancies in this instances are astounding. I would presume that most of the facts are available as a matter of public record given the Supreme Court hearing - can anyone substantiate the massive variation between this article and the book/film please? 86.24.124.69 (talk) 00:09, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * In the absence of sources, these violent personal attacks against Doyle must be considered vandalism. I have reverted. _R_ (talk) 21:01, 24 June 2008 (UTC)