Talk:Destroying Avalon

Contested deletion
The previous deletion was made under claims of G7 and A7. This time the article obviously does not meet G7, and A7 doesn't apply to books. See WP:CSD. --Noiratsi (talk) 18:02, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * You're right, A7 doesn't apply to books. Yet it did get deleted in an AFD, so I'm not sure which takes precedence here. Common sense suggests that deletion should be declined, but maybe we should let the reviewing admin decide: what do you think? Altered Walter (talk) 18:09, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * To qualify for G4 the page has to be 'substantially identical to' or have the same problems as the original page. I don't think the previous deletion discussion put forward any arguments that would be valid for this page. I don't know if the article is notable or not, but I don't think the previous discussion discussed that in enough detail to be a useful reference. A new discussion might be useful, or we could just go hunting for sources. --Noiratsi (talk) 18:15, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Well I'm going to just WP:BOLDly remove the speedy then. Let's see if we can find sources, as you suggest. Thanks, Altered Walter (talk) 18:26, 6 January 2013 (UTC)