Talk:Destruction layer

Recently removed text
I've just removed the following text from the article: "Destruction layers are often found associated with a change in subsequent pottery styles or material culture artefacts, indicating an invasion by a foreign people or intrusive element."

I've removed it because I think it oversimplifies the point and it doesn't have a reference to back it up. The article broad splits destruction layers into two groups: "natural causes (for example earthquakes), or as a result of a human action" (I previously added 'human' as a replacement for 'military' since not all human caused destruction is military in nature, eg: arson). With natural causes a change in material culture wouldn't necessarily follow, which is a key point made by Torrence & Grattan.

I think the main focus of the sentence was that following destruction layers caused human action there may be a change in material culture, but again that doesn't necessarily follow. It places all the emphasis on external forces (ie: invasions) whereas civil war could be a cause. Similarly, a change in material culture may indicate a new group but that group could come from within that society rather than an invasion, or the change could be a response to the destruction. In short there are too many variables for the sentence I removed to be especially helpful to a reader. Richard Nevell (talk) 17:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Richard Nevell (talk) 17:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)