Talk:Destruction of al-Jalaa Building

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 23 January 2022
In the lede, the concluding-sentence goes: "The event generated significant controversy, as the building contained offices for news agencies Associated Press (AP) and Al Jazeera.". Also, the very first sentence of the "Destruction" section goes: "On 15 May the IDF targeted the al-Jalaa Building in Gaza, among the occupants of which were Al Jazeera and the Associated Press.[1][2][3][4]" Both should instead read ‘...Associated Press, Al Jazeera and other news outlets...’ & ‘...which were Al Jazeera, Associated Press and other news outlets..’; per this, this & this, and multiple confirmations from statements which confirm that it was the Al Jazeera network's Gaza bureau as a whole, and not simply the one of its flagship Standard Arabic-channel, as I understand it's the common practice to refer to that article whenever any broad-reference to the network is made across this site. ''' This ought to stop. ''' The Agence France-Presse's own workers even "mentioned" Al Jazeera English's "handle" on Twitter when announcing their decision of offering shelter to the affected journalists. Optional fix: The term “...they're..” in "Despite saying they're in possession of proof for their allegations," phrase should read in full. Regards. —103.163.124.68 (talk) 11:02, 23 January 2022 (UTC) Edited: 12:33, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅. Heartmusic678 (talk) 11:42, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Requested move 16 July 2024
Destruction of al-Jalaa Building → Destruction of the al-Jalaa Building – The usual grammatical convention would be to say "the al-Jalaa Building", and this can be seen in multiple sources. &mdash; The Anome (talk) 09:11, 16 July 2024 (UTC) &mdash; The Anome (talk) 09:11, 16 July 2024 (UTC)