Talk:Deutschland-class battleship/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jhbuk (talk) 17:40, 5 April 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

I've done a litle copyediting, but I haven't found any real problems Thanks for reviewing the article, Jhbuk. Parsecboy (talk) 18:25, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * General characteristics: No idea what "less marked weather helm" means? Couple of dab links .  Lead well written.  "Schleswig-Holstein was hit by RAF bombers in December 1944 and sunk in shallow water. She was still able to use her armaments, however, until a fire permanently disabled the ship"  I assume the ship was salvaged and repaired to some degree, rather than sitting on the sea bed with her superstructure out of the water?
 * I linked weather helm and fixed the two dab links. Thanks for cathing those; I knew about David Beatty needing disambiguation when I wrote it, but apparently forgot after I hit "save" :) The latter is exactly what happened; it was the final months of the war, there was no time to do anything but use the guns were they sat. Parsecboy (talk) 18:25, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Well referenced from a variety of sources
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Can't think of anywhere that's lacking.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Several very good images; maybe another close-up may be beneficial, but this would probably be quite hard to find.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass