Talk:Devaneya Pavanar

Is it really encyclopedic to say his descendants live in penury?
Yes, it has a source attached to it, but is it any of our business? Does it add to our knowledge of Devaneya Pavanar (which is ostensibly the purpose of this article)? It reads more like gossip than anything else, and mean-spirited gossip at that. Tigercompanion25 (talk) 15:47, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * And it's been fixed. Thank you, prompt and attentive fellow Wikipedians. Tigercompanion25 (talk) 19:34, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Devaneya Pavanar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070723121117/http://www.ejvs.laurasianacademy.com/ejvs0801/ejvs0801.txt to http://www.ejvs.laurasianacademy.com/ejvs0801/ejvs0801.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:26, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

I do not know why so many people are interested in this 'pseudo' scientist and why so much importance is given to his absurd theories. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.141.9.38 (talk) 12:33, 22 February 2018 (UTC)