Talk:Deveselu Military Base/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Oxi2514 (talk · contribs) 22:03, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Pass. Prose is clear, layout is good, article can be understood and word choice is unbiased
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Pass. Standard reflist, reliable sources, no original research. Copyvio/plagiarism issues addressed.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Pass. Article size is good and stays on topic.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Pass. Article is written from a neutral standpoint.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Pass. Article is stable.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Pass. All images are tagged, suitable and captioned
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Opening Comments
Hey, il be reviewing this article as soon as I can. This is my first GA review so please bear with me, and I apologize in advance if any of my findings are incorrect. Plan to get a decent amount of the review done in the coming days however will have it done by next weekend at the most. Oxi (talk|he/him)


 * Hey there, thank you for taking the time to review the article. And no worries, review it at your own pace :) Alin2808 (talk) 22:40, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Infobox
Little thing I found, was reading through Source and I noticed it mentions a Colonel Veronel Vavura who served before Razvan Bratulescu. You may want to mention him in the "Past Commanders" infobox section
 * ✅ Also changed the source to an official one and changed the years of use for the base to match its establishment in 2012.

Spotcheck
Will be checking 5 random sources later to make sure there's no original research
 * Source 17: Verified.
 * Source 6: Verified.
 * Source 16: Verified.
 * Source 2: Verified.
 * Source 7: Verified.

Spotcheck Notes
Just want to check, is roaf.ro the official Romanian Air Force website? 
 * Yes. You can also check the official sites with the site of the Ministry of Defence -
 * Brilliant, thank you.

Closing Comments
I have concluded my review. Excellent job with this article, it meets all 6 criteria and all of my suggestions and issues have been addressed well. I'm happy to say that this article has. Congratulations. :) Oxi (talk|he/him) 10:11, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you again for the review! :) Alin2808 (talk) 12:34, 6 November 2022 (UTC)