Talk:Devil May Care (Faulks novel)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk · contribs) 14:47, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Do I have a choice...? ;-) Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 14:47, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Not really! You've probably got as much mileage done on these articles as anyone else now! - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 14:57, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Toolbox checks
 * No dab issues.
 * ELs generally okay but Financial Times (Hitchens) requires registration, probably should note that in citation. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 00:13, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 09:42, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Prose
 * Completed my usual copyedit, happy with it now if you are.
 * It looks a lot better now, thanks. - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 09:42, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Structure/detail References
 * Look fine.
 * Look reliable.
 * In terms of citations, use consistent page numbering, e.g. in Garland, you have "179-188" alone but in others you use "p. ".
 * ✅ the auto cite facility doesn't add the p., so I've forced in in there now - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 09:42, 17 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I think MOS overrides caps in references, e.g. "PAPERBACKS".
 * ✅ - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 09:42, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Well that was an example, there was another case with "REVIEW", but I took care of it. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 12:56, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Supporting materials
 * Images look okay. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:44, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Happy to pass -- well done. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 12:56, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * That's great Ian, many thanks indeed - as always! - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 13:00, 17 June 2012 (UTC)